DeKalb County Seal
DeKalb County, Illinois

Minutes of the
DEKALB COUNTY HEALTH BOARD


March 27, 2001


BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Fred Peltz, D.D.S., President; Glenda Pecka, R.N., M.S., Secretary; Sonja Conway, Ph.D.; Mike Groark, J.D.; Carl Heinisch; Steve Kuhn, P.A.; Joe Seneczko, D.V.M.; Brazilian Thurman, M.S.W.; Darrell Wiley, M.D. 

BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:  Katy Eaton, F.N.P.; Photine Liakos, M.D.;  

 

MINUTES

On a motion by Mr. Kuhn, seconded by Dr. Wiley, the minutes of the Board of Health meeting of January 23, 2001, were approved.  Motion carried. 

 

Informational Presentation on TAILS Vision for a Public – Private Partnership 

Kathy Stelford, President of TAILS Humane Society Board, introduced herself as the director of Oaken Acres Wildlife Center.  She stated that DeKalb County currently operates a “bare bones” animal control program with one animal control officer for DeKalb County’s 568 square miles.  Dogs are boarded in seven leased dog runs at Malta Veterinary Hospital.  She stated there is a need for more comprehensive services for the changing DeKalb County.  A relatively new, but proven, concept is the animal control center which combines the law enforcement aspect with that of the humane society, offering adoption services, outreach programs and community education.  Ms. Stelford stated that animal control centers are recommended by the Illinois Department of Agriculture, the agency that licenses such facilities.  She stated that the TAILS board is requesting endorsement of their proposal by the Board of Health to build and operate an animal control center as a public/private partnership between DeKalb County and the TAILS Humane Society.   

Ms. Stelford stated that this type of facility would help in the efforts to control rabies since the enforcement of rabies licensing of dogs and cats is one proven method of controlling the spread of rabies from the wild population to pets and then on to humans.  The registration of dogs and cats also provides the best method of identifying strays and returning them to their owners before they bite or become a nuisance to the public at large.  She stated that the current use of police that are called in to assist one animal control officer who cannot respond to the many complaints of strays is wasteful of law enforcement resources.  This, in turn, should reduce the costly efforts of the Sheriff’s office and municipal law enforcement in providing animal control services.   

An additional reason for endorsement, in addition to the public health and safety issue and the inefficient use of police officers to respond to animal control calls, is the cooperative alliances that will be formed with Safe Passage in aiding victims of domestic violence with shelter for their pets and to DeKalb County Hospice in offering a compassionate solution for the terminally ill patient who cannot find a home for their pet.   

George Balster, Vice President of TAILS and Small Animal Director at Bethany Animal Hospital, expressed his appreciation to the Board of Health and the Health Department in their role in improving the health of the residents of the county.  He stated that the mission at this meeting is to present a vision or concept to the Board for consideration.  The vision is to build an animal control center for DeKalb County, which will include animal control services and adoption.  The group, TAILS, has been in existence for two years, and has had a feasibility study conducted by a California consultant to determine the need for a shelter in the community.  Dr. Balster presented the Board with a packet of information.  A sample of a petition was presented in support of the building of a community-owned, multipurpose, state-of-the-art, centrally located and much needed animal shelter by DeKalb County.  He reported that the document currently has 600 signatures.  A presentation by TAILS was held at Kishwaukee College on options and adoptions of animals and compassionate and comprehensive alternatives for the homeless animals of DeKalb County.  A copy of a letter to the editor from a number of DeKalb County veterinarians was presented, expressing support of the TAILS initiative.   

Dr. Balster pointed out that, so far, 430 donors have contributed to the TAILS fundraising efforts, which included a George Winston concert that brought in $30,000.  TAILS has taken in a total of $87,000 in donations.  $5,000 of these funds were donated toward the spay/neuter program, which is a voucher program for eligible families based on need.  Considerable education has been done in the schools.  The TAILS organization is currently working on land acquisition located on three to four acres in a prime location in DeKalb, which involves a gift and land swap.  He reported that, once this is accomplished, the group would begin a capital fund program for the building.   

Dr. Balster stated that the current shelter is outdated and overcrowded, and the current Animal Control Program provides only what is required by law.  In 2000, 129 bites were reported and 225 strays were picked up in DeKalb County.  However, with an emerging urban community, animal control will be an even more needed service.  He added that Kane County is currently in the initial stages of developing an animal control center. 

Cary Groth, Athletic Director at Northern Illinois University, stated that the DeKalb County population is at nearly 90,000, a 14.2% increase from the previous year.  Communities experiencing the greatest growth are Cortland, Genoa and Sycamore.  It is projected that these changes will continue over the next several years, and the largest growth will most likely be seen in the next 10 to 15 years.  The Humane Society estimates that DeKalb County has 35,000 licensable animals in approximately 600 square miles.  The estimated percentage of animals ending up at shelters is 3%, with a potential of 2,700 animals visiting shelters on an annual basis in DeKalb County.  Ms. Groth reported that tagging is needed to prevent disease and to provide necessary resources and offer animal control services.  Society today expects a lot of services to be provided by taxes, and the people that are moving into our county are used to services that protect them and that provide services for their pets.  Ms. Groth stated that DeKalb County does not currently offer these services, and this population needs to be accommodated in the near future.  She feels the County is headed for a disaster with the animal population and the growing human population. 

Dr. Balster introduced Sheriff Scott, pointing out that this animal control center could relieve law enforcement officials of some of the animal issues they must deal with from time to time.  Sheriff Scott stated that 190 to 200 animal type calls are handled by his staff each year, which includes stray dogs running at large, dog bites and dogs attacking other animals.  This number does not include the City of DeKalb, City of Sycamore or some of the smaller communities.  Sheriff Scott reported that the Chiefs of Police of Cortland, DeKalb, Genoa, Hinckley, Maple Park and Sycamore join him in endorsing the concept and long-term goals of the TAILS organization because it allows for a more effective and better trained response to dog and cat issues.  An animal-related call to the Sheriff’s Department may take the officer anywhere from 15 minutes to 2 hours to handle.  This is a very time consuming and very frustrating issue for these officers, and with many of the 190 calls, the officer is not in a position to call the Animal Control Officer until a great deal of time has been spent on the situation. Sheriff Scott quoted one small town Chief as saying, “They have increasingly been getting calls/complaints about cats and dogs.  It takes their one car out of commission for an hour or two, and most times, the officer uniforms are damaged and the car needs to be cleaned after each use.”  It is Sheriff Scott’s opinion that the TAILS proposed plan of action would be helpful and reassuring to the citizens of DeKalb County, while at the same time, reducing the burden on local law enforcement. 

Dr. Balster stated that a major concern, as far as need, is doing a better job in the area of rabies vaccination compliance.  Animal control officers believe that only one-half to two-thirds of the dogs in DeKalb County are vaccinated.   TAILS’ suggestion is to add a rabies requirement for cats in addition to that of dogs, as cats are a major host for rabies.  The state to the west of Illinois had many cases of rabies, while Illinois had 22 and DeKalb County had 2, with all these cases related to bats.  He feels that, as a matter of public health, it is important that the county be committed to preventing human exposure to rabies.  With an expanded staff, better compliance could be reached and quicker response times obtained.  Dr. Balster stated that Winnebago County has a wonderful program, and the residents have a high level of respect for the services.  In TAILS visits to many shelters and animal control programs, the most successful were those combining government with the humane society.  He projects 2,400 animals coming through a shelter in a one-year time period.   

Dr. Balster presented a breakdown of income from the sale of tags, municipal contracts, adoption of dogs and cats and donations.  He pointed out that no vehicle or office costs are included in these expenses.  Such a project is labor intensive and the greatest expenditure would be for staff and building upkeep.  The current program generates approximately $106,000, estimating 10,000 dogs vaccinated and registered for rabies.  Commitments would need to be made to change the format for rabies registration and vaccination and adding contracts for municipal contracts.  These are proven methods by other centers to generate revenue to cover operating expenses. 

Major needs of the center were explained.  A donation of 3½ to 4 acres of land would be made.  Per the feasibility study, the building would be between 8,000 to 10,000 square feet at $100 per square foot, which totals $800,000.  This facility would include 60 runs, 50 cat cages, an isolation area and appropriate office space.  A plan for the allocation of space has been developed.  Dr. Balster reported that TAILS has had individuals in the construction business offer to donate their time and efforts toward this project.  A capital funds drive will begin soon, and it is believed that 50 to100% of the money can be raised through this means.  The cost of the building will depend on the type of facility constructed.  He pointed out that, for continuance of the animal control center, it would be best if it were owned by the county and not by an organization.  It may be necessary for the County to issue a special purpose bond for the remainder of the cost of the building.  Dr. Balster stated that TAILS could create an endowment fund to help run the center.  The organization also wants a staff of which they can be proud and one that is trained to do a specific job. 

Dr. Balster reviewed an outline of expenses, which were based on those of Winnebago County, which is three times the size of the TAILS proposed operation.  Staff will include a director, manager, receptionist, two kennel workers and two and one-half wardens totaling $192,000 in salaries, with $30,000 budgeted for animal care, food, and medications and $50,000 for repairs and utilities, for a total of $272,000 per year in expenses. 

Proposed funds for the center include 50% from the sale of tags, 30% from municipal contracts, 10% from the adoption of animals, and 10% from donations.  Different tag options were presented for dogs, unneutered dogs, cats and unneutered cats.  At $10.25 for a dog tag and $5 for cats, $203,000 would be generated.  If the fee could be substantiated and the program accepted by the community as a good service being provided, fees could increase to $15 for dogs and to $10 for the registration of cats, which would generate $330,000. 

The payment by a town or village would be made by determining their percentage of the county population as a whole.  Dr. Balster pointed out that this aspect would need to be marketed before the center was started.  Total income, consisting of tags, municipal contracts, adoption, boarding fees and donations, would generate between $338,000 to $505,000.  Any excess revenue would go towards decreasing the debt on the building.   

In summary, TAILS is sharing this information with the Board of Health for their consideration and comments.  Their vision is (1) to ensure the public health of DeKalb County residents by doing a better job of vaccination compliance and stray dog and cat and nuisance wildlife control; (2) to combine the effects of governmental function and animal welfare and adoption; (3) to provide new ideas for revenue to support an animal control center; and (4) for TAILS to support this concept in a major way with land and money.  Dr. Balster stated that it may be necessary for county government to use its power to build an animal control center, but it could be an enterprise center with revenue covering costs.  He thanked the Board of Health again for listening to their concerns and suggestions.   

Mr. Heinisch asked if this could become a “back door” way of supporting the program by becoming a general tax liability for the county or dependent on the real estate taxes of the community.  He feels it should be user pay, and added that he is sympathetic and supportive of this concept.  Dr. Balster responded that the idea is that those owning animals would support it.  He pointed out that this project would not materialize unless the concept was presented with municipal contracts in place and a commitment to a set amount of fees as far as licensure was concerned.   

Dr. Peltz pointed out that the literature states that TAILS is not associated with the current DeKalb County Humane Society, and wondered how that organization feels about this concept.  He also asked if this group would provide competition for the current shelter or if it could drive them out of business.  Dr. Balster responded that the current organization has been invited to join this group, adding that their feelings are not really known.  One of the problems with the current shelter is that it is out of the way and not located near population centers.   

Dr. Peltz stated that the current shelter has had fundraisers in the past, and he wondered if they would continue to have fundraisers.  He also questioned if there would be friction between the two groups or if the current shelter would phase out while the TAILS group phased in.  Ms. Stelford responded that there is a feeling of resentment that there is a new group attempting to develop a center, but added that current shelter staff have been invited to meetings several times but staff there are not sure what TAILS is proposing is appropriate.  She pointed out that the current shelter is donation-based, and the TAILS concept is based on generating revenue in many different ways.  She added that there is never a lack of dogs or cats to adopt.   

Ms. Groth pointed out that TAILS would also provide educational sessions in the schools, as well as for the general public.  This will be a broad-based service-based program.  She added that a resident would not have to have an animal to receive services.  Dr. Wiley asked how many staff are involved in the current shelter.  Ms. Stelford responded that credible numbers have never been received. 

Ms. Stefani, TAILS board member, reported that she previously served on the board of the current animal shelter and resigned when the board was not given the opportunity to vote on the TAILS concept.  She added that the TAILS board is very different from that of the current shelter in that there is a lot of discussion and input from board members and the community. 

Ms. Conway questioned the health of the animals at the current shelter.  Ms. Stelford stated that the shelter houses 260 dogs and 190 cats in one year, with surrounding counties receiving the overflow from our county.  Unfortunately, they are also receiving the donations for taking these animals.  She added that one of the veterinarians on the TAILS board has made statements of health concerns regarding animals not being vaccinated at the shelter.   Ms. Groth described the shelter as inhumane, and not being a good environment for the animals or for the people that work there.   

Ms. Stefani stated that the educational component that the educational committee envisions  encompasses many different programs.  One is the concept that offers education to young people to help them understand and earn respect for all living things, making them a more well-rounded citizen. 

Dr. Peltz asked what the TAILS program would do with stray animals.  Ms. Stelford responded that the group intends to have a separate portion of the center for wildlife rehabilitation.  Nuisance wildlife will be released in an appropriate manner if they are well or rehabilitated first if they are injured.  Ms. Stelford stated that most adult animals would be taken to Oaken Acres.  She has co-taught a class with 23 to 25 participants training to be wildlife rehabilitators.  85 to 90% of the animal control center will be dogs, cats and exotics, with NIU providing most of the exotics.   

Dr. Wiley asked if it was possible to tighten up on the vaccination of dogs and cats.  Dr. Balster stated that statistics show there are a number of animals in DeKalb County that are not vaccinated, adding that it is not possible for one animal control officer to handle everything.  Ms. Stelford pointed out that these statistics include farm animals that are sometimes not vaccinated.  Dr. Wiley asked what the consequence is if the dog is not registered.  Mr. Drake responded that there is a ticket procedure whereby the owner is fined.  Mrs. Grush stated that the problem lies in finding the unregistered or unvaccinated dog.  Dr. Wiley asked if it were feasible to increase the percentage of vaccinated animals.  Mrs. Grush stated that to substantially increase the number of dogs vaccinated and registered would require something like a “door- to-door program” whereby each home is visited to determine if an animal exists there and is not registered.  Dr. Seneczko stated that cats are not required to be registered at this time and finds it incredible that cats are not vaccinated as he has recently received several calls in regards to cat bites. 

Karen suggested that an ad hoc committee be formed to meet and report back to the full Board.  Dr. Peltz stated that another option would be that the full Board holding an extra meeting rather than forming an ad hoc committee.  Mrs. Grush stated there is still a great deal of information that needs to be gathered.  She supports holding a special meeting at some point after more information is received. 

 

DIVISION REPORTS 

Mrs. Grush stated that no new grant money has been received at this point, but she is hopeful additional tobacco monies will be forthcoming.  The Department of Public Health budget includes $40 million for state and local funding to prevent and reduce tobacco use.  The budget also includes an additional $10 million for local health departments to be used to address health priority areas identified by local needs assessment.  She pointed out that since tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable illness and death in Illinois and the nation, addressing our identified local needs would be an appropriate use of this money.   

Mrs. Grush pointed out that the employment of nurses continues to be a problem.  A meeting was held at Home Care today to develop a plan to cover staff shortages this summer with planned vacations and one staff nurse going on maternity leave in May.  She stated that it could become necessary in the near future to not accept all referrals.  Mr. Kuhn stated that it would be a major concern if referrals could not be accepted.  While he appreciates being proactive and looking ahead, there is no other agency to pick up these patients in our community.   

Mr. Drake, director of Environmental Health, introduced Dan Berres, Animal Control officer, and Pete Adrian, coordinator of the Solid Waste Management Program.  Mrs. Grush introduced Dr. Palmer, who has been Animal Control administrator since 1984.   

Mr. Adrian presented the 2000 DeKalb County Recycling Rate Survey.  He stated that DeKalb County’s comprehensive recycling rate is 68%, the percentage of all waste disposed of in DeKalb County.  He pointed out that one reason for the high recycling rate is because there is a business in the county that recycles concrete and construction/demolition debris.  The rate without this material is 46%, which is still one of the highest, if not the highest, rates in the state of Illinois.   

Mr. Adrian presented a chart comparing the waste recycled from 1995 through 2000.  The amount has been consistent over the past two years in the amount of waste recycled and the volume of waste going to the landfill.  He stated that this report will go to the Planning and Regulation Committee of the County Board as they are concerned about how much waste is disposed of in the landfill and how much of that waste is out-of-county.  Mr. Adrian pointed out that DeKalb County has an agreement to not accept more than 10% waste from out-of-county, with the rate this year at 8%.   

A chart showing the composition of the solid waste stream or commercial versus residential recycling was presented with commercial recycling at 35.41%, commercial waste at 28.61%, residential waste at 16.08%, and residential recycling at 19.89%.  A table was also presented showing the final disposal locations for DeKalb County’s solid waste, including DeKalb, Lee, Ogle and LaSalle County locations, as well as the Winnebago Reclamation Service.  Mr. Adrian pointed out that residential recycling is doing quite well, with 92% of residents in DeKalb County recycling to some degree.  Mrs. Grush stated DeKalb County should be proud of this recycling rate. 

Mrs. Baj, director of Home Care, stated that her main concern is staffing, adding that she finds it scary that she is unable to hire nurses.  She is facing staff on summer vacations and one nurse on maternity leave.  Mrs. Grush feels that our agency is competitive salary-wise.  Mrs. Pecka pointed out that nurses are not signing on even with the offer of large bonuses because they know the hiring organization must be short-staffed and desperately in need of staff.   Mrs. Baj stated that Home Care has not offered sign-on bonuses because current staff would resent such action.  Dr. Peltz asked if much money was being spent on advertising for nurses.  Mrs. Baj responded that she is unsure of the cost to date, but ads have been running almost continuously this year.  Recently, ads were run in papers out of DeKalb County and ads may soon be placed in Rockford papers.  She feels the best way to obtain new staff is through word-of-mouth that this is a nice place to work and is a good job as far as the nursing profession goes. 

Ms. Conway asked if the agency had any involvement with NIU’s School of Nursing.  Mrs. Baj responded that she did speak with Kishwaukee College staff and that the Home Care Program acts as a site for NIU students.  She pointed that most of these students, however, return to the city to work.  She added that the program is unable to hire new graduates because of the independence required during their home visits, and nurses must have one year of medical/surgical experience.  Mr. Heinisch stated that the TriCounty Community Health Center does more with Kishwaukee College and NIU in terms of students participating in their programs.  Mrs. Grush pointed out that TriCounty was designed to be a site for students.   

Mrs. Lux, director of Personal Health Services, reported that staff in Public Health have been very stable for a long time and the programs have grown more slowly than in Home Care.  Currently, she has two nurses relocating, a maternity leave beginning in July, two nurses having surgery, a program coordinator and a case manager resigning and summer vacations planned.  She stated that experience is required, but a new graduate could be hired.  She indicated that this has been done in the past and has worked out well.  Mrs. Grush stated that an advertisement was run recently with no responses received.   

All grant programs have been reviewed by Department of Human Services staff, with very, very positive reports received.  She is proud of the programs reviewed, which provides positive feedback that our programs are good.   

Mrs. Zanellato, director of Health Education, stated that a fifth grader from Kingston won the poster contest for the Tar Wars Program and placed third in the state where the award was a 13” television.  Her staff has been working with McDonald’s Corporation, and table tents will appear in their restaurants in the next month that are geared primarily to parents with a callback piece to see if the agency receives responses.  Ms. Zanellato added that all division programs are very busy and going well.   

Mrs. Pecka stated that she has noted a real resurgence of smoking in younger people, including the high school level, making it important to get the word out on the dangers of smoking.  Mrs. Zanellato stated that the tobacco industry has documented that advertising costs have increased to $10,000 per minute to recruit new smokers.  This makes it difficult for public health to turn it around, but there is a great deal of research as far as tobacco use prevention that will help in the future.  Mr. Kuhn stated that the news this evening addressed the issue that women have caught up with men on smoking cancer rates with the biggest increase in young teenage girls.  Mrs. Pecka added that she sees four to five cases per day in acute care centers with smoking-related illnesses.   

Mr. Kuhn stated that he was impressed with the numbers of the WIC caseload at 1,343.  Mrs. Lux stated that the caseload two to three years ago was 900 clients.  It has been possible to increase the caseload in WIC and be paid for it even though the per client rate is the same as it was in 1992.   

 

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

On a motion by Mr. Heinisch, seconded by Mrs. Pecka, the Financial Statements of January and February 2001 and the Claims for the months of February and March 2001 were approved.  Motion carried. 

 

NEW BUSINESS 

FY2000 Financial Statements 

Mrs. Grush reported that the FY2000 audited financial statement would normally be completed by this meeting, but has not been done because final instructions for completion of the Medicare Cost Report have not yet been issued due to implementation of the Prospective Payment System. 

$1.1 million was budgeted in the Medicare – Home Nursing line item, and it is expected that $1.3 million will be received.  Mrs. Grush stated a payback for the period 11-1-99 to 9-30-00 could be a possibility this year.  She explained that, in 1999, costs were based on the new building and a number of items going into the building.  The following year, the agency’s reimbursement rate is built on those costs.  As some were one-time costs, this past year’s reimbursement rate may be higher than actual.  She added that, in October when PPS was implemented, the program received initial payments for its 130 patients.  Every month since then, 30 to 40 patients have been admitted so a large sum of money was received at that time. 

A total of $3.5 million is projected to be earned in the FY2000 budget, as compared to the budgeted figure of $3 million and the revised budget figure of $3.3 million.  Mrs. Grush stated that, assuming a substantial payback, the agency’s revenue should be at least $3.3 million. 

FY2000 expenses were 6% or $3.1 million above the budgeted figure.  This was due, in part, to the purchase of Home Care software and hardware for approximately $100,000 from the Office Furniture and Equipment line.  Mrs. Grush pointed out that expenditures are very close to the revised budget figure.  She added that the agency also paid the Social Security and IMRF for the Home Care Program staff, which was not included in the original budget.   

Revenue comparisons from 1993 to 2000 were presented.  She pointed out that much more revenue was generated in Home Care in 1999 in Medicare and insurance due, in part, to the closing of Allen Home Health Agency and Alpha Christian Registry no longer accepting home care patients.   

Revenue, expenses, and fund balance by year from 1982 through 2000 was presented.  Mrs. Grush stated that this reflects a projected fund balance of $1.5 million, and she is hopeful that the Medicare Cost Report will be finalized by budget time so the actual fund balance will be available. 

 

FY2001 Merit Increase 

Mrs. Grush stated that the compensation policies of both the County and the Health Department provide for an annual Cost-of-Living Allowance (COLA) given in December and a merit increase in mid-year to eligible employees based upon availability of funds.  This mid-year increase will be effective June 3, 2001.  She added that she feels comfortable in giving a 0 to 3 percent increase this year to eligible employees.     

Mrs. Thurman moved to approve a 0 to 3 percent increase to eligible employees, effective June 3, 2001, seconded by Ms. Conway. 

Mr. Kuhn asked if Home Care nurses would receive this increase since a salary adjustment was approved for them at the November meeting, resulting in three pay increases in one year.  Mrs. Grush stated that the nurses would begin falling behind again in terms of salaries if this mid-year increase was not given to them.  Mr. Groark asked if the recent increase given was considered a market adjustment.  Mrs. Grush responded in the affirmative, pointing out that it was to make the pay scale competitive with the current market.  She pointed out that Home Care salary expenses were up about 30% for the first three months of this year as compared to last year at this time.  She feels today, financially, the agency has the funds to give this increase and must do so to remain competitive. 

Dr. Peltz asked for an explanation of an “eligible employee.”  Mrs. Grush stated that the employee must have been hired by December 1, be a permanent employee, and be evaluated by their supervisor who awards an increase from 0 to 3% based on performance.  She stated that the majority of employees receive a 3% increase, with an agency average of generally around 2.8%.  If an employee is at the top of their range, a 0 to 3% bonus is awarded.  The COLA given in December is based on this increase, which averages 4.5% for an annual rate. 

Motion carried.

 

Home Health Annual Review 

Administrative Review 

Federal regulations require that the Governing Board annually review the policies and procedures of the Home Care Program and the Board of Health bylaws.   

Mrs. Grush announced that it is not possible to determine the cost per visit until the Medicare Cost Report is completed, adding that it was difficult to obtain numbers this year because of the new computer system.  Statistics indicate that 1,215 more visits were made this year than the previous year, an increase of 8%.  The number of patients served increased from 697 in 1999 to 825 in 2000.  She added that the majority of Home Care patients are referrals received from the hospital and most are discharged because patients have met their goals.   

A summary of the medical record reviews, completed by the Audit Committee, was presented. 

 

Personnel Policies 

Mrs. Grush pointed out that one change in the Personnel Policies is that an individual must be employed before December 1 and be eligible for permanent status to be eligible for the merit raise given around June 1.  She stated that employees are terminated during the probationary period if there are any serious doubts, but occasionally, the probationary period is extended for up to three months.  She feels that these employees should be eligible for the merit increase at the end of their extended probation.   

An addition in the area of Weekend Differential is the paying of time-and-a-half for home visit-related time after-hours by the on-call weekday Home Health Nurse and for visit-related time for Home Health Nurses during critical staff shortages upon administrative approval.   

In the area of Weekend Differential, nurses assigned to work weekends and holidays are reimbursed a differential set by the Board of Health.  The Animal Control Officer also receives a differential at a rate set by the Board of Health for on-call work after normal working hours.   

The area of Travel and Expense Reimbursement was changed to clarify that the amount paid to employees for mileage for use of the personal car is meant to cover such things as gas, oil depreciation, insurance and deductibles related to a work-related accident.  Another change is that travel reimbursement for staff responding as the result of being on-call shall be portal to portal.   

 

Home Care Policies 

A new policy presented, “Transfer to Inpatient Facility with Resumption of Care or Discharge” is related to the institution of the OASIS assessment on all patients and the Prospective Payment System (PPS).  Mrs. Baj stated that, prior to PPS, the patient would have been discharged when they entered the hospital, but now are placed on hold until the end of their 60-day certification period.  At the end of the 60-day period, the patient is discharged if they do not return to service.   

 

Bylaws 

No changes were recommended to the Bylaws of the DeKalb County Health Department at this time.   

Mrs. Pecka made a motion to accept the proposed policy recommendations, seconded by Mr. Kuhn.  Motion carried.

 

Breast and Cervical Cancer Grant Provider Agreement 

Mrs. Grush stated that the agency received a small Breast and Cervical Cancer Grant for DeKalb County.  Every county in the state has this program, and our agency is a subcontractor to Winnebago County.  This grant is being implemented to provide breast and cervical cancer screening for low-income women who do not have resources to receive a pap test or mammogram.  Our agency will act as case manager of these clients, with actual medical screening and services provided by other providers such as TriCounty, Kishwaukee Community Hospital, Dr. Thornton and Dr. Baumgart.  She reported that mammograms will be done at Kishwaukee Community Hospital (KCH).  Reimbursement will be based on Medicare rates for diagnostic procedures, but no funding is allotted for treatment.  There is a Bill before the legislators to allow these low-income individuals to be covered under IPA for follow-up.  As case managers, treatment could be located through some foundations that fund these activities.  There would be agreements with those providing medical service, such as KCH that is doing the mammograms, as well as Dr. Thornton and Dr. Baumgart.  A sample agreement, which has been approved by the States’ Attorney’s office, was presented to the Board.  

Mr. Kuhn raised the concern about no funding available for treatment.  He pointed out that this population may have higher risks, since historically, they have not had as much health care and that is why they are targeted in this grant.  He stressed the need to encourage legislators to make funding available for treatment.  Mrs. Grush stated that she would write a letter on behalf of the Board of Health.  She added that, while she has not had experience with this particular grant, every county in the state has the grant and have been successful in finding resources for these individuals.  

Mr. Kuhn moved to pursue writing to state legislators to seek funding for treatment of patients that are found to have pre-cancerous or cancerous conditions under the Illinois Breast and Cervical Cancer Program, seconded by Mrs. Thurman.  Motion carried. 

 

Purchase of Agency Vehicle through the State of Illinois Contract 

Mrs. Grush reported that it would not be necessary to bid out the new Animal Control truck since it is being purchased under a government contract.  The Forest Preserve has expressed an interest in purchasing the current vehicle for $4,000.  Mr. Drake added that the current box would also fit on the back of the new vehicle eliminating the need to purchase a new one.   

 

CORRESPONDENCE AND ANNOUNCEMENTS 

Newspaper articles for the months of January and February included the certification of Dr. Liakos by the orthopaedic board, the proposal by a Senate panel for recruiting incentives for nurses, the honoring of smoke-free restaurants in DeKalb County by the Board of Health, the release of a report listing the progress and problems of early development in babies in the ‘90s, recognition of National Nutrition Month, and the issue of poison prevention beginning in the home. 

Correspondence included letters from Home Care patients expressing their thanks for the services provided to them and their family members. 

 

ADJOURNMENT 

On a motion by Mrs. Pecka, seconded by Mr. Groark, the Board of Health meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m.  Motion carried. 

 

                                                                                    
Glenda Pecka, R.N., M.S., Secretary
DeKalb County Board of Health


  | Home | Return to top | A-Z Index | Return to minutes |