The
Finance Committee of the DeKalb County Board, met on Wednesday, October 4,
2006 @ 7:00p.m. in the DeKalb County Administration Building’s Conference
Room East. Chairman Jeff Whelan called the meeting to order. Members
present were Jeff Metzger, Sr., Ruth Anne Tobias, Jerry Augsburger, Dennis
Sands and Michael Haines. Ms. Leifheit was absent. Others present were
Gary Hanson, Ray Bockman, Steve Kuhn, Ken Campbell, Karen Grush and Joan
Berkes-Hanson.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Moved
by Ms. Tobias, seconded by Mr. Sands, and it was carried unanimously to
approve the minutes from September 6, 2006.
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
Moved
by Ms. Tobias, seconded by Mr. Haines, and it was carried unanimously to
approve the agenda as presented.
BUDGET REVIEW OF FINANCE COMMITTEE BUDGETS
Ms. Tobias asked Mr. Hanson, how do we
allocate what the funds are spent on in the Opportunity Fund?
Mr. Hanson said that $100,000 is being spent
on the lobbyists, $100,00 is being spent on the Drug Court and $300,000 goes
to the Land Acquisition fund. There is another allocation of $250,000 that
will go to the rehab of the Public Safety Building, too, said Mr. Hanson
Mr. Haines asked Mr. Hanson about the 5-year
special projects – is that also for renovation?
Mr. Hanson said yes, there are several 5-year
plans, one is Special Projects, one for Renewal and Replacement programs on
the Sycamore Campus, one for the Jail, and one for the Health Facility.
Mr. Haines asked that if the referendum is
passed would the funding source change?
Mr. Hanson said yes. The monies for
renovating the existing jail that now come from the Opportunity Fund would
come from the New Public Safety Sales Tax.
Finance Committee Minutes
October 4, 2006
Page 2 of 5 pages
Mr. Sands asked that if the referendum is
passed and funds are available from different sources, where is the extra
money going?
Mr. Hanson said that they would go for the
jail operation costs. The referendum money would also be for the additional
staff salaries, the Transition budget, such as an allocation for the
Lieutenant position to be dedicated to the new building, said Mr. Hanson.
Mr. Sands where do the other funds go?
The funds would stay in the Opportunity Fund,
said Mr. Hanson.
Chairman Whelan asked about the County Farm
Land Sale, could Mr. Hanson explain it?
Mr. Hanson said that the County Farm Land
Sale was the money that the County received when we sold off sections of
land. Those revenues helped to pay for the Health Facility. Subsequent to
that the money now goes into this fund.
Mr. Hanson also reminded the committee that
the Forest Preserve District would be paying the County off for the
Potawottomi Woods Forest Preserve in November.
Mr. Sands asked Mr. Hanson if the County had
any Mega Projects planned in the next five years?
Mr. Hanson said that the judicial offices
here on the Sycamore Campus would need to expand.
BUDGET UPDATE AND STATUS
Mr. Hanson said that there are some changes
from when he first presented the budget.
The first two are revenue items and are
within the budget workbook, said Mr. Hanson. The Board of Health has
requested that the tipping fee for waste at the landfill be increased to the
maximum allowable. The fee would go from $1.10 to $1.27 per ton and
generate an additional $15,000 per year, with the effective date being
January 1, 2007. The monies will be used for programs that promote
recycling.
Finance Committee Minutes
October 4, 2006
Page 3 of 5 pages
Mr. Hanson said that the second change is
from the Sheriff’s Department. They are requesting that the County Board
consider implementing a law, which concerns medical care for prisoners.
The County may now require local medical care service providers to accept
the reimbursement rate that the State of Illinois uses for Public Aid
recipients. This request is approved as part of the FY2007 budget, but a
separate single-item ordinance will be submitted for enactment by the County
Board with an effective date of December 1, 2006. Mr. Hanson said that
Sheriff Scott will bring this item to the Law & Justice Committee and if it
is recommended by that committee, it will be forwarded to the full board for
consideration in November.
Another item that is being changed is from
the Supervisor of Assessments Office. At the last meeting of the Finance
Committee, requested an additional staff person (Administrative Clerk C) at
a total cost of $37,000. The Supervisor of Assessments cites additional
responsibilities and workload as the explanation. At the same meeting a
suggestion was made to look at using part-time people rather than a
full-time person to save on benefits. About that time, a staff change
occurred in the Assessment Office which opened the door for an opportunity
to address some supervision needs in the office. Coupled together, the
change suggested below will cost about the same as the original proposal,
but 14% more work hours will be available than in the original proposal.
The new request states that the Supervisor
of Assessments has requested that the position of Administrative Clerk A be
upgraded to the position of Chief Deputy of Assessments and that two
part-time positions of up to 4 hours per day each be approved with the
classification of Administrative Clerk C. This request will address the
need for a supervisor when the Department Head is absent as well as
addressing workload factors. The request is approved with an effective date
of January 7, 2007 for the part-time staff and retroactively to October 23,
2006 for the classification upgrade.
The last item is from the State’s Attorney’s
office regarding a workload problem. The Victim Witness Assistant is
currently funded by a State grant. They have decided that some of the
duties that this Assistant is doing are no longer allowable under the grant
which funds the position. These duties will now have to be performed by
someone else. The State’s Attorney has expressed an immediate need to add a
half-time Legal Secretary B to his authorized staff.
The Coroner/ESDA office who recently had the
retirement of a long-term employee working at the Secretary B
classification. The Sheriff currently has an unfilled position of an
Executive Secretary. Both the Coroner and Sheriff feel that they could
combine the duties that each position serves within their respective offices
and have one full-time person, recruited at the
Finance Committee Minutes
October 4, 2006
Page 4 of 5 pages
higher pay scale, fill that job. This would
then leave a half-time position to be transferred to the State’s Attorney’s
Office. There should be no additional cost as this arrangement, with the
Executive Secretary placed in the Coroner/ESDA budget and “loaned” to the
Sheriff as needed, allows the County to maximize reimbursements from the
State ESDA grant program.
Therefore, said Mr. Hanson, the new budget
paragraph will read, that the State’s Attorney has requested the addition of
a half-time Legal Secretary. The Sheriff and Coroner have requested to share
a full-time position of Executive Secretary under the supervision of the
Coroner/ESDA Director and to transfer the secretarial position to the
State’s Attorney’s Office and add it to a current half-time Legal Secretary
position for one-full position with benefits. This is effective
retroactively to October 23, 2006 as Departments had to respond to workload
factors from turnover and to comply with State grant requirements.
Mr. Metzger asked if there were any
additional equipment needs that were attached to the grant for these
positions? Any equipment needs for any of these positions?
Mr. Hanson said no.
Chairman Whelan asked, how much does this
add to the budget?
Mr. Hanson said nothing really.
Mr. Hanson reminded the committee that they
will be holding a Public Hearing on the budget at their November meeting.
REFERENDUM UPDATE FACTS AND FIGURES
Mr. Hanson handed out factual information
(see paperwork attached to these minutes) to the committee on the Jail
Referendum. It states what the money is going for. He also said that there
will be jail tours throughout the month of October that are open to the
general public. They will have speaking engagements scheduled and a video of
the Jail and brochures are being produced currently.
Mr. Bockman explained to the committee that
the ballot language has to be what the State Statutes states, nothing else
(see attachment to these minutes).
Mr. Sands asked, of this $20 million for the
jail expansion, is it true to say that half of it is for the building costs
and the other half is personnel?
Finance Committee Minutes
October 4, 2006
Page 5 of 5 pages
Mr. Hanson said that the $20 million is all
building costs. We will need $2 million a year to staff it. About $4
million will be generated a year from the referendum. About $2 million from
this amount will go for operating it and staffing it; $1½ million will go to
pay off the bonds; and half a million will go for alternate programs.
Mr. Hanson also handed out a Don’t Build
Option sheet to the committee. He said that the first sheet covers the fact
if the County does not expand and the prisoners are shipped out-of-County.
He said that the County is currently paying $71.00 per day to house the
prisoners out-of-County and if you inflate that by 5% over 10 years it will
cost the County $27,632,811.00.
He further stated that the second sheet shows
that if the referendum passes what it will cost for the proposed solution,
that is, to build a jail, operate it, start the alternate programs, pay off
the bonds, etc. Over a ten year period it will cost the County
$27,200,000.00, which shows that it is cheaper to expand the jail, said Mr.
Hanson.
The third sheet states that if we spend that
money in DeKalb County with salaries, buying supplies and put that money
into the local economy, what it would really generate. Mr. Hanson said
that every dollar that you spend in the economy turns over six times. So, if
we look after ten years, that’s where we will have generated $75,000,000.00
into the local economy.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved
by Ms. Tobias, seconded by Mr. Augsburger, and it was carried unanimously to
adjourn the meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Chairman Jeff Whelan
|